ZANUS AI FOR LAW FIRMS — CASE FILES
Pleadings, discovery, deposition transcripts, contracts, the firm’s precedent bank — loaded into curated libraries the AI reads from. Ask in plain language; get the answer with the document and page attached, scoped to who is allowed to ask.
Private tenant or your own server · unlimited users · privilege-conscious architecture

Libraries in priority order: executed agreements outrank drafts, current precedents outrank superseded ones.
PDFs, Word, scanned exhibits, faxed correspondence from 2009, hearing audio — the ingestion pipeline turns the banker’s boxes into queryable knowledge.
The AI cites the pleading, the transcript page, the contract clause — or says the answer is not in the file. In litigation, an invented citation is malpractice fuel; here it is structurally blocked.
The paralegal on the matter sees the matter; the associate on the other side of an ethical wall sees nothing — enforced server-side, not by folder etiquette.
“Have we ever litigated against this expert?” “What did we argue in the 2021 non-compete appeal?” “Which engagement letters contain the arbitration clause?” The firm’s history answers in seconds with documents attached — instead of depending on which partner remembers.

Only the roles and workgroups you authorize — ethical walls are workgroups, permissions reach the field level, and the server redacts what a user cannot see, even in shared calendars and searches.
Never. Your tenant is isolated; the firm’s knowledge is the firm’s alone — and the on-premises option keeps it physically inside your office.
← Previous: Back Office · Sharing with a colleague? 📄 Get the PDF · ✉️ Email this page ·