ZANUS AI FOR IP & PATENT PRACTICES — PRIOR ART & FILES
Specifications, claims, file wrappers, office actions, cited references, invention disclosures — loaded into curated libraries the AI reads from. Ask in plain language; get the answer with the file and figure attached, scoped to who is allowed to ask.
Private tenant or your own server · unlimited users · confidentiality-conscious architecture

Libraries in priority order: granted claims outrank drafts, current guidelines outrank superseded ones.
PDFs, scanned legacy wrappers, drawings, spreadsheet claim charts, examiner interview notes — the ingestion pipeline turns the archive into queryable knowledge, figures included.
The AI cites the specification paragraph, the claim number, the office-action page — or says the answer is not in your files. An invented citation in prosecution is a disaster; here it is structurally blocked.
Two competing clients in the same technology space? Their matters live behind separate walls — the AI answering one team cannot surface the other client’s documents, enforced server-side.
“How did we overcome the obviousness rejection on the 2019 sensor family?” “Which applications cite this reference?” “What did the examiner say in the last interview?” The archive answers in seconds with the documents attached — instead of depending on which practitioner remembers.

Only the roles and workgroups you authorize. Permissions reach the field level and the server redacts what a user cannot see — pre-publication material stays exactly as compartmentalized as you design.
Never. Your tenant is isolated; your clients’ inventions are theirs alone — and the on-premises option keeps the archive physically inside your office.
← Previous: Back Office · Sharing with a colleague? 📄 Get the PDF · ✉️ Email this page ·