ZANUS AI FOR RISK ASSESSMENT & VISUAL INSPECTION — COMPLIANCE
Inspection findings end up in claims, disputes and sometimes courtrooms — the footage and the reasoning behind every score must be intact, attributable and access-controlled. The architecture answers: isolated tenants, permissions to the field level, server-side redaction, a searchable audit trail, chain-of-custody-conscious handling throughout.
Private tenant or your own server · unlimited users · footage stays in your custody

One record per user: role, tags, and granular permissions over every domain of the system.
The server redacts what a role cannot see — a crew working one portfolio never sees another client’s sites, footage or findings.
A searchable log of every audited action: who viewed which footage, who edited which finding, when — the provenance question answers itself.
Scores carry their documented reasoning, reports carry their sources, pre-update snapshots preserve every prior version — what you said and why, provable later.
A year later, a claim disputes your score. The answer is a search away: the original footage, the rubric version in force that day, the documented reasoning, the inspector’s sign-off and every access since — assembled in minutes, not reconstructed from memory.

The handling is chain-of-custody-conscious: isolation, access control, audit trail and version snapshots are built in. Requirements for a specific legal or insurance context are reviewed with your team during onboarding — bring your counsel to the demo.
In your isolated tenant — never training outside models — or fully on-premises on hardware you own, physically incapable of internet exposure.
← Previous: Inspection Tools & Integrations · Sharing with a colleague? 📄 Get the PDF · ✉️ Email this page ·