ZANUS AI FOR FORENSIC AI & RECOGNITION — AUTOMATIONS
Describe the job in plain words — “when new case media is logged, sweep it for the case’s targets and file the triage summary” — and it becomes connected blocks on a canvas, running on its own, with every run visible and on the record.
Controlled tenant or air-gapped lab server · unlimited examiners · chain-of-custody-grade custody

A real flow: intake trigger, case sources, AI sweep, three outputs — drawn from a description.
A submission arrives: case record opened, media inventoried, custody entry drafted, acknowledgment sent to the requesting agency with a reference number — before the custodian finishes the physical check-in.
New media triggers the sweep: targets searched, candidate segments marked, the triage summary filed — the examiner starts the morning with a map, not a haystack.
Court dates and rush requests drive reminders and status drafts automatically — the prosecutor’s “where are we?” email is answered before it is sent.
Run states live on the flow: green success, red failure on the exact block. In a lab where a missed sweep can mean a missed suspect, silent failures are unacceptable — here, nothing fails silently and every run is on the audit record.

No — findings and reports always route through examiner confirmation and your approval workflow. Automations move work and drafts; humans release conclusions.
← Previous: Team Training · Sharing with a colleague? 📄 Get the PDF · ✉️ Email this page ·