ZANUS AI FOR PHARMA & BIOTECH — SITE OUTREACH
Site newsletters, enrollment-status updates, document-expiry reminders, investigator-meeting logistics — drafted by the AI from your own study records, in each site’s language, and queued for your approval. Study communications discipline without a communications hire.
Private tenant or your own server · unlimited users · GxP-conscious architecture

Campaigns and sequences drafted from study records — site updates, reminders, newsletters — awaiting approval.
Sites behind on enrollment, coordinators with expiring documents, investigators due a quarterly update: audiences built from your study data — no exporting lists to a mailing tool.
A document-expiry reminder, a follow-up a week later, an escalation to the CRA if unanswered: sequences drafted for approval, stopped automatically when the site responds.
A site in Warsaw and a site in Osaka get the same update in their own language, in your program’s voice — with your regulatory-review rules applied first.
Audience, content and sending live in the same system as the study records — nothing leaves your tenant to reach a mailing platform. “Remind every site with a delegation-log gap” becomes a drafted, scheduled sequence in minutes.


Every outbound study communication waits in the approval queue unless your team designates the category as auto-send. In a regulated program, that gate is not bureaucracy — it is the point.
Yes — the approval queue is the mechanism: route categories to the reviewers you designate, and nothing in that category sends until they approve. The audit record keeps every version.
Yes — the same module drafts partner sequences and conference follow-ups from your CRM records, with the same approval-first discipline.
← Previous: Automations · Sharing with a colleague? 📄 Get the PDF · ✉️ Email this page ·